(SQAUK) — In a time of widespread secrecy and ubiquitous conspiracy theories, the recent attempted assassination of Donald Trump has taken a shocking turn. Instead of blaming the Secret Service as being a bunch of bumbling idiots, as they would like us all to think, new information suggests that a stand-down order originated from the CIA. This revelation implies a potentially sinister plot that may involve high-level members of the so-called Deep State, a notion that is difficult to digest.
The assassination attempt, initially thought to be the result of a series of sloppy security lapses, now seems to have been a carefully planned betrayal. A Sqauk independent investigation suggests that Secret Service agents acted on orders from higher authorities, specifically the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA). This raises serious concerns about the CIA’s motives and its potential role in undermining American democracy, instilling a sense of betrayal and mistrust.
Investigative journalist Shepard Ambellas uncovered the irrefutable evidence as he meticulously calculated the trajectories and paths of confirmed bullet impacts using two or more reference points. This means that there is video evidence of a bullet hitting two or more people or locations. Shockingly, Ambellas’s calculations unequivocally demonstrate the presence of a second shooter in a sniper’s position. This shooter targeted the renowned FBO counter-sniper team, as abundantly evidenced in multiple videos and photographs. Consequently, the team instinctively took cover, thwarting the sniper’s attempt to take a shot. Coupled with exclusive eyewitness testimony from inside the venue and gunshot audio analysis, our independent investigation yields findings of at least one additional shooter.
The evidence contradicts the mainstream media narrative that a 20-year-old with no Internet history was able to get a sniper rifle and a range finder and get within 150 yards of the former President of the United States. There are many inconsistencies in the mainstream narrative. The truth is that there was a second shooter in a sniper nest whose job was to take out the rooftop counter-sniper team closest to the shooter, identified by the FBI as Thomas Matthew Crooks.
The stand-down order, which left Donald Trump vulnerable, was not a matter of incompetence or oversight. It was a calculated move designed to remove a former president who had been a thorn in the establishment’s side. The implications of this are staggering. Suppose the CIA can manipulate and control the actions of the Secret Service. In that case, the very safety of our nation’s leaders is at the mercy of shadowy figures with their agenda. The fact that a sniper was allowed to set up a nest on site could have only been carried out by the highest levels of the Central Intelligence Agency.
Over the years, the common belief has been that the Secret Service is committed to protecting the President at all costs despite occasional mistakes. However, new evidence is prompting us to rethink this belief. Don’t forget the John F. Kennedy assassination. It is widely believed that the CIA, George H.W. Bush, and the Secret Service were involved. The compromised agents in the field were placed in an impossible position for a reason. At the Trump rally, this was likely done with temporary Homeland Security fill-ins for which the CIA gave counterfeit credentials. Moreover, the Secret Service claims it was local law enforcement’s job to secure the building from which Thomas Mathew Crooks climbed onto the rooftop. This conveniently passes the buck onto the local authorities but makes no sense.
The recent attempt on Donald Trump’s life is more than just an isolated event. It serves as a wake-up call for the American people. The “deep state,” often considered a conspiracy theory, is a natural and influential force. The CIA, an agency tasked with protecting national security, seems to be embroiled in internal power struggles that undermine the democracy it is meant to defend.
Sniper Nicholas Irving recently appeared on Vlad TV and questioned whether the Democrats had something to do with it. The host of the show mentioned that the Democrats view Donald Trump as an existential threat, which could suggest a motive for his assassination. Considering this perspective, if the Democrats see Trump as a “threat,” could that be enough reason for someone in power to carry out an attack on him?
The American public deserves the truth. This scandal must be thoroughly investigated, and those responsible for this betrayal must be held accountable. We cannot afford to let our leaders be pawns in a game played by unelected officials who operate in the shadows. The attempted assassination of Donald Trump and the role the CIA played in it is a stark reminder that the fight for transparency and accountability in our government is far from over, underscoring the urgency and importance of this matter.
Related video:
