(SQAUK) — In investigative analysis, Occam’s Razor is a crucial principle that often guides experts toward the most plausible explanation. This principle, named after the 14th-century philosopher William of Ockham, suggests that the one with the fewest assumptions should be selected when presented with competing hypotheses. In other words, the simplest explanation, with the fewest variables and conjectures, is typically the best.
Applying Occam’s Razor to the anomalies surrounding the assassination attempt on Donald Trump leads us to consider the most straightforward explanations. However, in this case, the diversity of inconsistencies and contradictions suggests that a more complex scenario might be at play. The numerous eyewitness accounts, delayed response times, malfunctioning security cameras, and conflicting ballistic evidence do not easily align with the notion of a lone, rogue assailant acting independently.
Instead, these anomalies collectively point towards a more intricate conspiracy, potentially involving multiple shooters and insider assistance. The unexplained withdrawal of a portion of Trump’s security detail and the sudden disappearance of a critical anonymous tipster hint at coordinated efforts within high levels of authority. These aspects suggest that elements within the Secret Service, and possibly the CIA, might have had a role in orchestrating or facilitating the attack.
The hypothesis of multiple shooters gains further credence when considering the forensic discrepancies in ballistic evidence. Different bullet types and trajectories could indicate the involvement of several assailants, each contributing to the scene’s chaos. Additionally, the corrupted surveillance footage at the critical moment of the attack suggests deliberate sabotage, likely by someone with access to the security systems.
While Occam’s Razor traditionally guides us towards more straightforward explanations, it also recognizes the necessity of accounting for all available evidence. In this case, the weight of anomalies and inconsistencies tilts the balance towards a more complex, multifaceted scenario. The involvement of insider elements within the CIA and Secret Service, alongside the possibility of multiple shooters, provides a coherent narrative that fits the observed irregularities.
This interpretation, though intricate, aligns with the principle of seeking explanations that best account for all known facts. It underscores the importance of not merely settling for the most straightforward hypothesis when evidence points to deeper layers of conspiracy. As investigations continue, maintaining a rigorous, evidence-based approach will be essential in uncovering the whole truth behind the attempt on Donald Trump’s life. Pursuing clarity in this case is about resolving the immediate incident and safeguarding the integrity of security and investigative institutions for the future.
Ten anomalies with the Donald Trump assassination attempt that don’t add up
-
- Conflicting eyewitness accounts: Eyewitnesses to the effort provided conflicting descriptions of the assailant’s appearance and actions. Some reported hearing shots from different locations, while others described a lone individual on a rooftop, creating confusion about the actual events.
- Delayed Secret Service response: The Secret Service’s response time appeared unusually slow despite their extensive training and preparation for such incidents. The delay raises concerns about potential lapses in protocol or unforeseen interferences.
- Inconsistent ballistic evidence: Forensic audio analysis revealed inconsistencies with the type of weapon reportedly used. Ballistic experts are puzzled by the disparities, suggesting the possibility of tampering or misinformation. The following accurate and top-notch analysis conducted by Health Ranger Mike Adams reveals at least four unique weapons were discharged in a short period during the attack on former President Donald Trump at the Pennsylvania rally on July 14, 2014.
Latest forensic audio analysis summary, including round 8, which appears to be the counter-sniper round that killed Crooks. pic.twitter.com/cN728G5Sjv
— HealthRanger (@HealthRanger) July 20, 2024
- Changing stories about the ladder: The media and authorities changed their story several times regarding a ladder purportedly bought by the shooter. First, he supposedly carried the ladder a distance of over a mile on foot before using it to climb onto a rooftop and shoot former President Donald Trump. That story later changed several times.
- Unverified claims of prior terror threats: Authorities had received previous threats from Iran against Trump, but no official records or concrete evidence substantiated these claims, raising doubts about their credibility. For all we know, the information could have been planted so the perpetrators would have an excuse to fall back on. If there were credible threats by Iran, then why was security so lax?
- Discrepancies in bullet flight paths: The particulars of shot, bullet trajectory, and projectile direction of flight seem to be the most significant subject the powers-that-be are attempting to cover at all costs. They don’t want you to know where the second shooter’s sniper nest was located. If you did, it would negate the lone wolf theory. No bullet came from the woodline. This bullet was intended for the iconic rooftop counter-sniper.
#TrumpAssassinationAttempt #SnipersNest #Shooter2 #TwoShooters Trump assassination plot unraveled: Shepard Ambellas reveals exact multiple shooter positions, trajectorieshttps://t.co/vwgW0mUjsU pic.twitter.com/8ut2k4Auep
— Sqauk (@sqauk_) July 21, 2024
-
-
Image credit: Sqauk 
Image credit: Sqauk 
Image. credit: Sqauk 
Image credit: Sqauk Sqauk investigative journalist @ShepardAmbellas has done a great job showing the sniper-nested shooter #2 and the assailants location at a distance to the podium of 700 feet. (Proposed shot #6 of 9 total audible shots per analysis) https://t.co/vwgW0mUjsU #AssassinationPlot pic.twitter.com/ucAbHImsV2
— Sqauk (@sqauk_) July 22, 2024
7. Multiple suspect vehicles found: Two suspicious vehicles were found thought to be connected to the incident; both a car and a van were reported to have explosives inside. Moreover, the purported shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, was found with an RF detonator on his person after he was fatally shot by a Secret Service counter-sniper, ending his life.
- 8. Unexplained withdrawal of security detail: On the day of the attempt, a portion of Trump’s security detail was inexplicably reassigned to a different location. This sudden change in protocol raises questions about potential inside involvement. Temporary DHS (possibly CIA) fill-ins were used.
- 9. Alleged assailant’s drone flight: The shooter, Thomas Matthew Crooks, reportedly flew a drone over the rally on a recognizance mission just hours before the Butler Farm Show rally.
- 10. Lack of transparency from investigative agencies Agencies responsible for investigating the attempt have been criticized for their lack of transparency and reluctance to share information. This opacity fuels suspicions and undermines public trust in the investigation’s integrity.
-
